Hitler and Napoleon’s invasions of Britain – How real were they? – My Analysis
In WW2 history I’ve read quite a bit about Hitler’s preparations to invade Britain. Many of you might not know that Napoleon was also planning to invade Britain.
Upon closer scrutiny, I don’t think Hitler was seriously intent, ever, on invading Britain. There are many proofs of this.
In this article, I’m going to keep it short. I might revisit this another day in videos.
Hitler could not only have invaded Britain by sea, but by air. This was an option open to him that Napoleon, of course, did not have. But one of the main proofs that Hitler never actually wanted to fight Britain is Dunkirk and how Hitler stopped his own troops from killing the British when he had them down. The "miracle" of Dunkirk" alone, is the FIRM PROOF that Hitler was letting the filthy, Jew-controlled, back-stabbing British off the hook – something they did not deserve. Hitler, and Hitler alone, let an entire British Army escape. There are other additional proofs that Hitler was hiding his real goals, which I won’t go into.
Hitler also had the option to invade Britain by air. It was super-high risk, but it was technically feasible. And he could also have combined an all-out air invasion with an all-out sea invasion, which, combined, would have been a much better idea. But there too is 100% proof that Hitler killed the idea instantly.
I have heard of Napoleon’s proposed invasion of Britain, because I’m familiar with Napoleon’s history, and I never took that invasion seriously. Napoleon had an army encamped along the coast, and this army, suddenly, was used to race across France to smack the Austrians and Russians who were gathering to attack France from the east.
But that army which was on the coast was actually preparing to invade Britain.
However, we are talking about technology, 200 years ago. You would think that Napoleon’s technology would stand less of a chance of invading Britain than Hitler’s chance. I too thought like that.
But in my reading of various biographies written by people related to Napoleon, I came across the personal memoirs of his private secretary. It’s not a fun read, and it contains all kinds of different things I’d never heard of before, and among them, British plots to murder Napoleon early in his career, just as the (Jewish) Allies were to later plot to kill Hitler. Well, the Jewish owned British, were doing terrorism and assassination 200 years ago and they were trying to murder Napoleon using their various filthy infiltration methods back then.
What amazed me though, were the detailed accounts by Napoleon’s private secretary of the French preparations for invading Britain. The scale of the preparations were actually ENORMOUS. Not only that, but Napoleon’s troops were practicing their invasion drills until they were perfect.
Napoleon had a huge fleet of barges and related boats which would set sail to Britain. But they had to function in concert with the French navy.
Napoleon had worked out a deceptive plan to fool the Royal Navy. But Napoleon became concerned by his Admirals and whether they had the same dash and determination that his army had. The bottom line is that Napoleon was concerned about his Admirals. His barges and his other strange boats and the army were good to go.
Napoleon had an army of 150,000 that would cross to Britain and invade Britain. It caused an insane amount of panic in Britain.
The final nail in the coffin of Napoleon’s plans was when the British cornered his navy and bottled them up in a harbour elsewhere. That was the final straw.
So that was the end of his massive preparations to invade Britain, which would have landed a first class army on their shores and definitely smashed all resistance. It stood a chance of being the greatest invasion of Britain of all time.
However, that was not fully the end of Napoleon and the French Navy.
In another memoir, where Napoleon speaks in 1816, when he was on Elba, Napoleon explained the massive fleet he was building. This included enormous fortifications he was working on in what is now Belgium or Holland I think.
Napoleon had been expanding and building huge harbours and fortifications along the French coast and even beyond the French coast. Napoleon had plans to build a navy that would be able to take on the British Navy. Napoleon was confident that in time he could crush the British Navy.
It is becoming evident to me that the wealth and power of France, even after the 1812 failed invasion of Russia, was still amazing. The French were far from beaten, even though the history books claim that.
Hitler on the other hand, really struggled at sea, and could never really face the British. The Germans were at a bigger disadvantage than the French under Napoleon. Hitler’s real secret weapon, and the weapon that really made the difference were the U-boats.
Hitler’s U-boats focused on destroying British supplies from America and other sources. This weapon alone very nearly won WW2. The U-boats were absolutely amazing. Remember, the modern military submarine was really invented by the Confederates in America. And the Germans took that, even in WW1 and began developing it as a serious weapon.
The U-boats of WW2 were the single weapon Hitler had that came the closest to actually winning the war. The scale on which they sank British and American shipping was quite insane. They were enormously successful.
So Hitler could have defeated the British by cutting their supply lines in modern times. That was much more feasible for him than actual invasion, because he had too many problems on European soil itself.
But in Napoleon’s case, with no aircraft and no submarines, it is amazing that Napoleon had a full fleet, complete with an army, and they were ready to roll, and if they could just have reached the British coast, they would EASILY have rolled over the British. Easily.
This same army that was preparing to invade Britain, was turned around, and some additional troops were added, boosting it to 200,000 or so. This army raced across France and into Austria, where in a series of lightning battles, they destroyed an Austrian army and then went on to smash a combined Russian-Austrian army.
There is no doubt whatsoever that if that French Army had reached Britain, it would have taken over Britain in short order.
Napoleon, like Hitler, was a believer in militarisation, and people don’t fully grasp the extent to which he militarized France. That is something I’ve only fully grasped in recent months.
Interestingly, I’m finding lots of references to Napoleon and his run-ins with Jews, Bankers and all sorts of business types of people and his intense hatred of them!
As I suspected, there are a lot more parallels between Napoleonic France and Hitler’s Germany than people realize. The problems they faced were almost identical, and I am finding, more and more, that they had a lot of similar responses.
Both of them found Britain to be the core enemy, and that enemy teamed up with Russia.
I think in a nutshell, it was a similar thing, a European-Warrior state fighting against Jewish money power and it’s long tentacles from it’s root source of Britain. Britain is really the original Israel. That’s a fact.